J. Determination of Discipline

If based on the Investigation Committee’s report the provost determines that the alleged misconduct is substantiated by the findings of the investigation, he or she will determine any disciplinary action against the respondent, Discipline for misconduct in research should depend on the facts of the case, and may include but is not limited to reprimand, suspension with or without pay, reassignment of duties, foregoing salary increase and/or benefit improvements, revocation of tenure, if applicable, and termination. Only in the case of revocation of tenure and termination shall there be a right of appeal, as required elsewhere in this Handbook.

The University of Tampa will also take appropriate administrative actions against individuals when an allegation of misconduct has been substantiated. If the provost determines that the alleged misconduct is substantiated by the findings, he or she will decide on the appropriate actions to be taken. The actions include:

1. Informing in writing the agency (if any) sponsoring the activity;
2. Informing any publisher of research connected to the misconduct;
3. Informing in writing the University president;
4. Withdrawal or correction of all pending or published abstracts and papers emanating from the activity where misconduct was found;
5. Restitution of funds as appropriate; and
6. Other action deemed appropriate by the provost.